Skip to main content
Skip to main content

General Meeting - Kate Mooney / Epenthetic inheritance, or: How I learned to stop inserting and love phonology

A young woman in three-quarters profile, looking thoughtfully into the near distances, with the diffuse dark grey of a blackboard behind her.

General Meeting - Kate Mooney / Epenthetic inheritance, or: How I learned to stop inserting and love phonology

Linguistics Friday, April 10, 2026 3:00 pm - 4:30 pm Marie Mount Hall, 1108B

Friday April 10 at our General Meeting, Kate Mooney presents her work on the quality and phonological status of epenthetic consonants, abstracted below.


In this talk, I challenge the hypothesis that epenthetic consonants are true inserted segments, unrelated to surrounding material. Instead, I propose Epenthetic Inheritance: a theory in which epenthetic consonants are mutations of existing material. Closely following work in traditional phonetics and Articulatory Phonology, I argue that when epenthesis is most general (exceptionless & productive), it is best analyzed as a strengthening of existing articulatory movements.  This allows us to explain why epenthetic consonants tend to minimally perturb existing articulatory dynamics, and also why they are often immune to phonotactic restrictions placed on segments. Lastly, it supports a strong cut  between morphophonological and phonological operations: Phonology can only use the gestural material it already has, whereas morphophonology alone can truly insert and remove segments.

Add to Calendar 04/10/26 15:00:00 04/10/26 16:30:00 America/New_York General Meeting - Kate Mooney / Epenthetic inheritance, or: How I learned to stop inserting and love phonology

Friday April 10 at our General Meeting, Kate Mooney presents her work on the quality and phonological status of epenthetic consonants, abstracted below.


In this talk, I challenge the hypothesis that epenthetic consonants are true inserted segments, unrelated to surrounding material. Instead, I propose Epenthetic Inheritance: a theory in which epenthetic consonants are mutations of existing material. Closely following work in traditional phonetics and Articulatory Phonology, I argue that when epenthesis is most general (exceptionless & productive), it is best analyzed as a strengthening of existing articulatory movements.  This allows us to explain why epenthetic consonants tend to minimally perturb existing articulatory dynamics, and also why they are often immune to phonotactic restrictions placed on segments. Lastly, it supports a strong cut  between morphophonological and phonological operations: Phonology can only use the gestural material it already has, whereas morphophonology alone can truly insert and remove segments.

Marie Mount Hall false