Skip to main content
Apply Give
Menu

Meaning Meeting - Daniel Goodhue / Acquisition of non-canonical clause type-speech act mappings in preschoolers, and canonical mappings in infants

A man standing behind a TV screen, fixing the wires, as the screen displays a portrait of that man's head

Meaning Meeting - Daniel Goodhue / Acquisition of non-canonical clause type-speech act mappings in preschoolers, and canonical mappings in infants

Linguistics Monday, December 13, 2021 12:15 pm - 1:30 pm Zoom

December 13 at the Meaning Meeting, Dan Goodhue practices his talk, "Acquisition of non-canonical clause type-speech act mappings in preschoolers, and canonical mappings in infants," for the remarkably named SPAGAD Lecture Series, or "Speech Acts in Grammar and Discourse," hosted at Leipzig under the auspices of Germany's Center for General Linguistics (ZAS). The abstract is below.

Human languages tend to have three basic clause types (declarative, interrogative, imperative) that are canonically associated with three basic communicative functions (assertion, question, request). And yet, the specific forms used to express each function vary from language to language. This means that whatever language each child is learning, they must distinguish the different clause types from one another, as well as identify their canonical speech acts. Moreover, children must disentangle the canonical functions of each clause type from non-canonical uses, like interrogative requests and rising declarative questions. Figuring out how children develop these linguistic capacities requires that we first answer important empirical questions about when they do so. In this talk I will discuss two experiments addressing this question (joint work with Valentine Hacquard, Jeffrey Lidz, and Jad Wehbe). The first focuses on rising declaratives, investigating preschoolers’ ability to infer the force of speakers’ intended speech acts when they don’t match the clause type uttered. Via a novel game task, we show that children use pragmatics, prosody and clause type to uncover the intended illocutionary force of speakers’ utterances. The second, ongoing experiment tests knowledge of canonical speech act-clause type mappings in 18- and 24-month-old infants via a novel preferential looking methodology. Our preliminary data suggests that children in this age range may know that rising polar interrogatives are linked to questions while falling declaratives are linked to assertions.

Add to Calendar 12/13/21 12:15:00 12/13/21 13:30:00 America/New_York Meaning Meeting - Daniel Goodhue / Acquisition of non-canonical clause type-speech act mappings in preschoolers, and canonical mappings in infants

December 13 at the Meaning Meeting, Dan Goodhue practices his talk, "Acquisition of non-canonical clause type-speech act mappings in preschoolers, and canonical mappings in infants," for the remarkably named SPAGAD Lecture Series, or "Speech Acts in Grammar and Discourse," hosted at Leipzig under the auspices of Germany's Center for General Linguistics (ZAS). The abstract is below.

Human languages tend to have three basic clause types (declarative, interrogative, imperative) that are canonically associated with three basic communicative functions (assertion, question, request). And yet, the specific forms used to express each function vary from language to language. This means that whatever language each child is learning, they must distinguish the different clause types from one another, as well as identify their canonical speech acts. Moreover, children must disentangle the canonical functions of each clause type from non-canonical uses, like interrogative requests and rising declarative questions. Figuring out how children develop these linguistic capacities requires that we first answer important empirical questions about when they do so. In this talk I will discuss two experiments addressing this question (joint work with Valentine Hacquard, Jeffrey Lidz, and Jad Wehbe). The first focuses on rising declaratives, investigating preschoolers’ ability to infer the force of speakers’ intended speech acts when they don’t match the clause type uttered. Via a novel game task, we show that children use pragmatics, prosody and clause type to uncover the intended illocutionary force of speakers’ utterances. The second, ongoing experiment tests knowledge of canonical speech act-clause type mappings in 18- and 24-month-old infants via a novel preferential looking methodology. Our preliminary data suggests that children in this age range may know that rising polar interrogatives are linked to questions while falling declaratives are linked to assertions.

 false